| www.laurahird.com |
| THE NEW REVIEW |
|
Biography and bibliography of Cheever on the Kirjasto website
|
|
About Me Artists Books & Stuff Competition Contact Me Diary Events FAQ's Film Profiles Film Reviews Frank's Page Genre Bending Hand Picked Lit Links Heroes Index Links Lit Mag Central The New Review New Stuff Projects Publications Punk @ laurahird.com Recipes Samples Sarah’s Ancestors Save Our Short Story Site Map Showcase RELATED BOOKS![]() Order Cheever’s ‘Falconer’ Order Cheever’s ‘The Wapshot Chronicle’ Order Cheever’s ‘Oh What a Paradise it Seems’ Order Cheever’s ‘The Journals’ Order Cheever’s ‘Bullet Park’ Order Scott Donaldson’s ‘Conversations With John Cheever’ Order Cheever’s ‘The World of Apples’ Order Scott Donaldson’s ‘John Cheever: A Biography’ Order Susan Cheever’s ‘Home Before Dark: a Biographical Memoir of John Cheever by His Daughter’
|
|
Of all the archetypal New Yorker short story writers of the Twentieth Century- John O’Hara, John Updike, Alice Adams, J.D. Salinger- perhaps the best of them was John Cheever- and he was certainly the best of the three big Johns. That said, I do not particularly like John Cheever’s stories. Of the over sixty tales in this collection a good thee quarters involved characters that do not personally interest me - mid-Twentieth Century upper crust whites, martini-totalling who seem as stranded on the island of Manhattan, or his fictive suburb of Shady Hill, physically as their views of the world are intellectually. In his world even middle class people have maids. But, almost all of the tales are tight and well-wrought, and that’s an important distinction to note when reviewing, for few critics are able to separate themselves from their biases and inclinations. That said, while the tales are good, and at their best, very good, excellent, and even near-great, there isn’t one that really leapt out as being inarguably great, mostly because they are tales that work on only one or two levels, even when richly layered. This is because they follow a formula, the New Yorker formula, and follow it well, but Cheever never achieves an expansion of his character’s worlds the way he tinkers incessantly with the interior narrative structures. To use a metaphor, his stories are solidly and well built, but the interior decorating can be atrocious. His tales almost always start off with a good and/or arresting start, and his ends are also usually quite deft. The middle sometimes sag, in even the best tales, not because of length, but because the tales are so dependent upon their extreme supports. An example of this can be seen in the book’s first tale, and one of its most famous, ‘Goodbye, My Brother’, which starts out as an extraordinarily keen portrait of an upper class WASP family gathered for a reunion at their beach house, then one brother viciously attacks and beats another brother, and all sense of realism is gone, as the tale becomes just a well-wrought melodrama, rather than the realistic character study it could have and – dammit - should have been. Anyone who has known these sorts of folks will recognize the precise realism of the tale’s early details and moods. This only makes the melodrama all the more disappointing, for that action, in the real world, so close to what Cheever sketches early in the tale, is merely every impotent middle-aged WASP failure’s Cain fantasy: forced violence of the sort that only restrained WASPs can feel, because they’re emotionally effete and intellectually ‘above’ its real causes, and so their laureates pour it out into fiction that clunks with insincerity, like that very moment in a potentially great tale. The ending sinks even lower, as pure melodrama, trite, with poor poetry:
Fortunately, the first ending in the book is also possibly the worst. Another famed, but poorly wrought tale is ‘The Five-Forty-Eight’, which is another fantasy excursion into violence, albeit emotional, with the physical merely threatened, as a woman who had an affair with her boss gets revenge in a way that would now be called stalking. These two tales are part of the worst aspects of mid-Twentieth Century literature that almost smothered the short story form, and certainly propelled it to ignominy for several decades. ‘O City Of Broken Dreams’ is not in that vein, but a tad too long, although a terrific evocation of the American Dream just at the beginning of modern Madison Avenue, as a would-be playwright and his family seem to grab the brass ring, only to have threatened legalities set in, and them decamp back to the Midwest. Forget the differing tales they’re from and just look at the mythography and less forced nature, of the ‘realer’ poetry that ends this tale vis-à-vis ‘Goodbye, My Brother’:
This is an example of flat-out great writing, for even in that little bit there is the sense of something larger than the characters and their story hovering about. At his best, though, Cheever takes on the lower classes, and succeeds. What amazes me is that he seemed to be far better at home when dealing with the emotional rawness of such characters and situations, vis-à-vis the social machinations of elitists. In ‘Christmas Is A Sad Season For The Poor’ a self-pitying elevator operator scams his rich tenants into pitying him with food and gifts until he gets giddy, reckless, and gets fired, and his epiphany, at tale’s end, takes seed in others. Another excellent tale in the same vein is ‘The Superintendent’, which follows a day in the life of the title character. The reactions of the man, and his dilemmas, are perfectly captured, and even decades later, save for a few differences in technology, the same story is inflicted upon people like him still. The ending is one of the best in the book. Technically, Cheever also pulls off marvellous turns of narrative direction that can leave one with a wholly unexpected ending, as judged by a tale’s start, but wholly realistic if reading the tale. There is also a dealing with the same themes and life events that occurs in many of the tales. In ‘Just Tell Me Who It Was’ a rich, successful older man finds out his younger wife has cuckolded him, and attacks the man he suspects did it, in public, but unlike the scene in ‘Goodbye, My Brother’, the violence flows naturally from the story elements that lead up to it. Another element from ‘Goodbye, My Brother’ that is reworked more successfully in another tale occurs in ‘The Seaside Houses’, in which the end of a marriage and the passage of time are all summed up in a fleeting instant by the narrator. It is a tale void of the melodrama of the lesser tale that shares its themes. That the two better tales were published in the New Yorker in 1978 and the lesser one in 1951 should not surprise. The depth and richness of the later tales is evident. Yet, a brief tale like ‘Reunion’, in which a father and son briefly reunite, never to see each other again, is also terrifically wrought and almost lyrical. Yet, as good as he can be, his tales should be read sparingly, because too many in a row tends to manifest the New Yorkerish weaknesses in his short story corpus: suburbia, adultery, middle class purgatory, fedoras, regretful housewives, and cocktail parties that all become fairy taleish, and are topped off with a climactic three or four sentence epiphany. John O’Hara may have invented that genre, but Cheever brought it to its apex, and - as shown - the epiphanies can be marvellous. In a sense, one might argue he personified the post-World War Two generation in fiction the way F. Scott Fitzgerald did the Jazz Age. Fortunately, though, Cheever is the far superior short story stylist because his tales are not as hermetically walled off to the contemporary reader as those of Fitzgerald, and therefore more emotionally more accessible, especially when limning schlubs. Yet, many of Cheever’s tales, as formulaic as they could be, also broke the fourth wall, or commented slyly on themselves, pointing up the lie that Postmodernism was anything new or revolutionary. And, in Cheever’s story, the devices actually enhance or serve the tales, and are not mere accoutrements to blow the writer’s own horn, and solipsistically preen on their coolness. The art comes first in Cheever’s tales. Look at how he describes a simple act in ‘The Enormous Radio’, a tale about an old woman who loses herself in another world:
‘The Stories Of John Cheever’ may not be the best Twentieth Century American fiction had to offer, but it’s emblemic. To not read or not understand these tales is to be as void of the American character as ignoring Dickens is to the English character or Chekhov is to the Russian character of the prior century. Read the book, learn from it, and seek out those who will do even more for this century. Reproduced with permission Dan Schneider is editor of Cosmoetica. To visit the site, click here or to read Dan's story, 'Angels and Gangsters' on the Showcase section of this site, click here
|
| THE STORIES OF JOHN CHEEVER (Ballantine 1999) Reviewed by Dan Schneider |
| If you would be interested in reviewing films/books for the site, contact me here |
| Book Review |